Nonfarm payrolls rose 29,000 last month, against a consensus estimate of 90,000 and a prior reading of 133,000. The unemployment rate rose to 4.2% from 4.1%, also above the 4.1% forecast. The miss was not offset elsewhere: GDP growth for the prior quarter was revised to a final 2.2%, comfortably above the 1.5% estimate but still down from 2.5% in the previous reading, and personal income grew just 0.2% month over month against a 0.3% prior and a 0.4% forecast. Personal spending did the opposite, growing 0.9% against an 0.8% forecast and a 0.1% prior, more than four times the pace of income growth in the same month.

None of this moved the volatility or credit gauges the house regime model weighs most heavily. The VIX sits at 15, the 2s10s curve holds a normal 0.45 points, high-yield spreads are tight at 324bp, and the financial stress index reads -2.35, benign. The weighted regime vote assigns 78% to risk-on. The house's own macro stress composite reads 2.1, in the Low band. Here it has not.

Part of the explanation sits in the prediction markets. Contracts on no change in Fed interest rates after the October meeting price an 82% probability, on $24.3M of trading volume, a market already positioned for a hold regardless of what payrolls did. Core PCE at 0.2% against a 0.3% forecast gives the Fed room to hold without defending against upside inflation risk, and the next scheduled high-impact release, ISM Services PMI on October 5 (consensus 55.7, prior 55.4), is the next test of whether the labor softness is a single print or a trend.

One widely read blog disputes the calm reading from the other direction. Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis argues that long bond yields are rising despite the weak jobs number and the better-than-expected PCE print, citing a 30-year yield at 5.64%, and frames this as the bond market in revolt against further easing (mishtalk.com). This desk's own facts can neither confirm nor deny that framing, since a 0.45 2s10s spread describes the slope of the curve, not the level the blog is citing. If the blog's reading is right and term premium is building on supply or inflation-persistence grounds, the regime model's 78% risk-on score is describing credit and volatility conditions that have not yet caught up with what the long end is pricing. If the move it describes fades instead, the calm reading needs no revision at all. Both outcomes are live; neither is this desk's call.

The jobs report dominates the macro print, but the GDP and income data underneath it cut in different directions. The final read on GDP growth came in at 2.2% quarter over quarter, above the 1.5% consensus, yet half a point below the 2.5% prior reading, a deceleration even after beating the forecast. Personal income rose just 0.2% month over month, under both the 0.3% prior and the 0.4% estimate, while personal spending accelerated to 0.9%, ahead of the 0.8% forecast and far above the 0.1% prior. Spending grew more than four times as fast as income in the same month, a gap that shows up as a drawdown elsewhere in the household accounts rather than in the GDP print itself, which measures the quarter before.

ISM Manufacturing PMI held at 54.5, just under the 55 forecast and essentially flat against the 54.6 prior, still comfortably inside the expansion band above 50. Three readings within half a point of each other would ordinarily read as stability; set against a payrolls miss this size, it reads instead as the one piece of the macro data that payrolls has not yet dragged down.

The house's composite macro stress reading is 2.1, Low, consistent with the financial stress index at -2.35. Both gauges are built from market prices and credit spreads rather than the labor data released today. The jobs miss has not yet shown up in either.

The rest of today's commentary is on Pro and Full Access.

Those sections are absent from this page, not hidden.

See the plans · Sign in